'Post Freudian theorists and their theories Essay\r'

'As indicated earlier, key personality educational theories that were developed later Freud’s psychoanalytic theory were either outright derived of it or aimed at criticizing some of its major comp angiotensin-converting enzyments. a) Erik Erickson i) St terms of discipline Barbara (2008) and Lieberman (2007) agree that the function of Eric Erickson was a direct differential of Freudian considerations in human development. Eric Erickson theory of psychosocial development concurred with Freudian view that life, development and challenges develop in items.\r\nPsychosocial theory further builds the theory of the ‘ego’ which was for the most part brought out by Freud as external ingenuousness inculcation to one’s mind. Particularly, the point in terms of Erickson psychosocial development powerfully cohere with Sigmund’s work. Clara et al (2008) explain that floor one of Erickson’s theory of psychosocial development is reflected by â €˜trust versus mistrust’ largely because the child is merely dependent on the caregivers.\r\nLike Freud mentioned the pleasure a child derives from oral stimulation, Erickson emphasized on the resulting experience as a platform in displace the child to the next spirit levels. Therefore, Erickson’s first put borrows the concept of external environment in creating plentiful force for the next stage. In the second stage of psychosocial development, Erickson equally borrows from Freud’s ‘anal stage’ which is a critical training factor. Nelson-Jones (2005) explains that from a higher consideration, Erickson argued that information to go to the toilet gave a strong soul of mark off and therefore great independence.\r\nAs Freud all the way brought out the notion of the ego, Erickson’s third stage of initiative versus guilt emphasizes the assertion of power and control which plays an important role in the later stages development. Erick son indicated that more children seek to assert their superiority among others but with measured considerations of the existing repercussions (Marrie and Janneke-van, 2007). Notably, Erickson agrees with Freud that parents and caretakers must step in to alleviate the needed reassurance and therefore avoid guilt to their green ones.\r\nIt is however worth noting that Erickson strongly differed with Freud on how capacious development persists in an individual’s life. trance Freud postulated that personality development only lasted to the venereal stage when an individual starts getting interested in cozy relationship with those of the opposite sex, Erickson postulated that developed progressed to the old age (Busch, 2009). However, scholars appear to be strongly divided with one group considering the last mentioned Erickson’s work to be based on criticism of the Freud’s work and therefore its advancement (Barbara, 2008).\r\nii) The notion of fixation sin gle resilient notion of Freud’s work is the notion of succession between different stages. Though they do not necessary cohere on time and expected repercussions, both theorists agree that people at different stages must go through them successfully or get fixated (Hayes, 2004). Fixation as henry (2009) point out denotes the inability to progress since latter stages are entirely dependent on the preceding(prenominal) stages success. Erickson argued that all stages present an individual with two negating outcomes; cocksure and negative.\r\nFor example between year five to eleven, Erickson indicated that a successful individual will become sprightly while the unsuccessful ones will suffer low quality (Laura and Pam, 2007). b) Lacanian theory In his work, largely referred to as the expire of Freud, Emile Lacan’s concepts appear to be fully define by the former (Adam, 2008). Though Lacan strongly criticized the Freud’s separation of the conscious (ego) and un conscious(p) (id), he largely employed the same concepts in his work.\r\nLacan argued that the conscious and unconscious considerations of the mind were not different, but operated from a exceedingly sophisticated and complex outline compared to Freud’s consideration. Locan mirror as Brickman (2009) and Gottdiener (2008) conclusions suggest is formative and a derivative of the experience an individual gets during development. Therefore, the paradigm of the imagery to be effective during the younger years as contradictory to the old age which is more subjective fits the Freudian connotation of development persisting only to the genital stage.\r\n'