.

Tuesday, March 19, 2019

Is Tiger That Great? :: essays research papers

There has been a vast amount of media exposure on Tiger woodwind. The media made Tiger Woods out to be some sort of golf god that nobody could beat and he was fundamentally reshaping the way the game was played. We did not believe that that Tiger Woods was really as good as the media said he was. firstborn off, we went to http//www.pga transit.com and http//www.tigerwoods.com to collect our entropy. We found the average scores of the top light speed PGA tour thespians. We found that Tiger Woods was actually ranked in southward place, one spot behind the scoring average leader, David Duval. However, there are currently somewhere in the neighborhood of 400 players playing the PGA Tour. It&8217s not too bad to beat 398 of them As a secondment to this incredible piece of randomness, came Woods&8217 biography and career statistics. Astounding considering his curt professional career. All of these observations combined with our own calculations have changed our earlier mention ed view. after(prenominal) hours of research and study we have found Woods to be a great player. This change of heart led to our meditation Even without the media nag Tiger Woods has proved himself, statistically, to be a great player. This hypothesis is backed by a great deal of statistical information and factual, proven input through our own calculations. After finding our data online it was already clearly evident that Woods&8217 was a good player, alone we wondered how much better he would seem after the math was done. We rely some of the following numbers impress you as much as they did us. The mean score of a PGA Tour Top 100 player is currently 70.63. Woods&8217 mean score is a dazzling 69.21. The total number of observations in our experiment was 104, because of certain PGA Tour ties within the averages. Our standardised deviation, which is the measure of the spread of a distribution, was found to be .52 for the Top 100 scores. The inner quartile range (middle 50%) of the data is .81. This is the difference between quartile 3 and quartile 1, which are 71.06 and 70.25 respectively. The median, or middle of all 100 scores was 70.8, with a minimum score of 69.13 (1 David Duval), and a maximum of 71.24 (100 lee(prenominal) Rinker). To return to the basis of our project we found Woods&8217 standardized z-statistic, or how many standard deviations from the mean he lies, to be a &82112.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.