R. v Burns case Breif

Case Facts The defendants Glen Sebastian Burns and Atif Ahmad Rafay were accused to have committed exasperate foremost degree murder in Washington State. In a confession to an undercover RCMP officer in British Columbia, sitting as a mob boss, it is clamed that Burns was a subjugate killer hired by Rafay to kill his parents so that Rafay could trip up insurance money for their deaths. It is claimed that Burns standard the victims with a baseball bat while Rafay watched (para.10). They threw their cloths away and took a bath to process away the blood. The accused claim that the aver confession was a lie to gain the confidence of who they conceit was a menold age Boss (para.11). They were to be extradited to the United States, where if convicted could acquaint the death penalty. The defendants appealed the extradition to the Minster of Justice. Burns line of work and government ministers Findings The accused claimed to the attend that their fraction 6(1) (right to re main and return to Canada) hold rights would be break if they were extradited, and that as a result the take care should consider if the defendants could be tried in Canada (para.16). The respondents similarly claimed scratch 7 (fundamental justice) and section 12 (cruel and unusual punishment) of the charter would be violated if extradited. The appellants distinguish their case from R.

v. Kindler and Ng because they were Canadian citizens, while Kindler and Ng were non. They claimed that Canada does not have the right to send its citizens away with the possibility of neer returning contrary to 6(1) of the cha rter (para.17). The respondents also claim t! hat their age at the time of the alleged offences, 18, should be taken into consideration. The Minister rejected the claim of banishment, because the purpose of the agreement was... If you want to lay down a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper